22% of Practicing Christians Feel Responsibility to Help Those Facing Discrimination


Articles in Faith & Christianity • January 15, 2020

This article is adapted from the newly released book, Where Do We Go from Here? Order your copy today!

Shop Now

For a recent study on race and equality in America, conducted in partnership with The Reimagine Group, Barna set out to contribute to a broader understanding of race relations in our present moment and equip church leaders with context for challenging conversations. This report, titled Where Do We Go from Here?, represents the first of several new Barna efforts to study race and the Church and assesses perceptions of the nation’s reputation and what practicing Christians—across racial, denominational and political fault lines—feel should be done to repair the damage.

In light of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, taking place this year on January 20, we wanted to take a closer look at some key findings from this report as well as offer data from past Barna studies on discrimination and racial injustice.

Who Should Address Discrimination?
One goal of Where Do We Go from Here? was to identify some social causes that practicing Christians feel the Church at large or individual Christians are called to address—in other words, some key areas in which faith requires people to be hands-on ministers of mercy. Among examples of groups that could be considered in need of relief, Barna included people who face discrimination.

Overall, just over one-fifth of practicing Christians (22%) says they have an individual responsibility to help those who experience discrimination; this is the top option selected, over other individuals, organizations (Christian or otherwise) and churches who could lend a hand. Though there are certainly many groups who might be victims of discriminatory attitudes or behaviors in the U.S., a primary example is racial or ethnic minorities. Thus, responses to this question are pertinent to broader discussions of racial justice or reconciliation. By race, there are few significant differences in how practicing Christians see a responsibility to help, in terms of offering resources.

When it comes to providing help in person, however, black practicing Christians are somewhat more likely than their white counterparts to see Christian organizations as most responsible for this kind of institutional support (21% vs. 15% of white practicing Christians). White respondents assume more personal responsibility to help others who are on the receiving end of discrimination (25% vs. 17% of black practicing Christians).

Younger generations tend to feel churches should be the primary source of support to those who have been discriminated against (21% of Millennials, 22% of Gen X), while Boomers assume a personal duty to help (27%). This could be linked to a growing public conversation on the realities of systemic injustices and whether their solutions should be individual or institutional in nature.

discrimination

responsibility

A Political Predicament
While exactly half of practicing Christians agree that the history of slavery still impacts the U.S. today, one of the starkest divides observed throughout this study occurs along lines of political ideology. In short, practicing Christians who have liberal views—just 17 percent of this sample—are dramatically more likely than practicing Christian conservatives (52% of the sample) to perceive consequences of racist structures, both past and present, in the U.S. Not surprisingly, moderates tend to occupy a middle ground between liberal and conservative approaches to this issue.

Three in four practicing Christian liberals (76%) agree that the effects of slavery are still felt in the country today. Conservative practicing Christians are just as likely to agree (38%) as they are to disagree (39%) that race relations remain fraught because of this painful history. A not insignificant proportion of conservatives, however, is unsure (17%). Though few practicing Christians of any political conviction say minorities rarely or never experience undeserved hardships, liberals are firmly convinced these obstacles exist. Two-thirds in this camp say there are “always” (32%) or “usually” (34%) hardships for minorities, well above the percentage of conservatives who agree (11% “always,” 19% “usually”). Instead, the bulk of conservatives says these challenges “sometimes” occur for non-white Americans (57%).

discrimination

Barna studies, including this one, point to correlations between diverse community and openness to the plights and perspectives of others—but among political factions, it’s unclear how this trend plays out. In fact, both Christian liberals and conservatives are similarly likely to report having friends of other ethnicities (64% conservatives, 69% liberals), as well as of different religions (76% conservatives, 72% liberals) or income levels (78% conservatives, 73% liberals). Liberals, however, are more likely to be representative of racial diversity to begin with— just over half are white (52%), compared to eight in 10 conservatives (80%)—so when they affirm the reality of ongoing challenges for people of color, many may do so from a personal place.

Further, Barna studies show that the personal nature of these topics may be amplified by the digital nature of discrimination and discourse today. For instance, 70 percent of U.S. adults say that hate speech in America has increased over the last five years, with many pointing to the internet as a catalyst. Tellingly, nearly half of U.S. adults who have experienced hate crime and / or hate speech in the past experienced it online via social media (45%).

And, as indicated above, views on racism, discrimination and the nation’s history are inextricably linked to our political realities, which are often in a state of unrest. For faith leaders, this makes already sensitive subjects even more difficult to address. Pastors today may rightly wonder: How can churches have a holistic, biblical response to discrimination and racial injustice? What does it look like to have constructive conversations, let alone foster unity, in a divided culture?

If you’re a leader preparing to tackle tough topics with your congregation or community on Martin Luther King Jr. day, in Black History Month and beyond, here are some resources from past Barna studies to help you cultivate informed, compassionate discussions.

The above is an adaptation from the Where Do We Go from Here? book. Check out this blog post for more articles and resources surrounding the topic of discrimination.

Comment on this research and follow our work:
Twitter: @davidkinnaman@brookehempell | @barnagroup
Facebook: Barna Group

ABOUT THE RESEARCH
This study is based on quantitative surveys of 1,007 U.S. adults, 1,502 U.S. practicing Christian adults and 600 U.S. senior pastors of Protestant churches. Among pastors, Barna oversampled to include more perspectives of black pastors (100 respondents total). Interviews were completed online and by telephone between April and August 2018. The rate of error is +/- 2.3 percent for practicing Christians, 3.9 percent for pastors and 2.9 percent for the general population, at the 95 percent confidence level.

Millennials were born 1984 to 1998.

Gen X were born 1965 to 1983.

Boomers were born 1946 to 1964.

Elders were born before 1946.

Practicing Christians are self-identified Christians who say their faith is very important in their lives and have attended a worship service within the past month.

Photo by Gift Habeshaw on Unsplash.

About Barna
Barna is a private, non-partisan, for-profit organization under the umbrella of the Issachar Companies. Located in Ventura, California, Barna Group has been conducting and analyzing primary research to understand cultural trends related to values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors since 1984.

© Barna Group, 2020

This article is adapted from the newly released book, Where Do We Go from Here? Order your copy today!

Shop Now
Your cart
Close
Clear Cart
Total
Shipping and discount codes are added at checkout.